Are people obligated to fight evil if they have the ability to do so Essay

Are peck obligated to agitate pestiferous if they have the readiness to do so And are intellectuals the most learn to lead society - Essay ExampleIt can be termed as destructiveness, as well as motives of causing pain and suffering for self-importanceish or malicious intentions. Leadership, conversely, has been illustrated as the procedure of social authority in which an individual can procure the aid, as well as support, of others in the deed of a common duty. Other in-depth meanings of leadership have excessively materialized. This paper will discuss whether people are obligated to fight repulsiveness if they have the ability to do so and whether intellectuals are most fit to lead the society than non-intellectuals. Question 1 There is a distinction between an individual who is unlearned of social etiquette and a individual who has a permanent impulse to wound and hurt other people. There is also a distinction between somebody who has a rough day, as well as someone who is rough every day. The fact is that evil, as well as an evil person, is characterized by deception, viciousness, inhuman treatment among other traits (Freeman 1). However, at other times people just might be having one of those temporary lapses that everybody has at times. The known characteristics portrayed by evil characters are destruction, depiction as well as manipulation. Destruction is where by people aim to cause damages. Evil people recurrently tear crop up relationships plus they cannot maintain friendships. Evil people continually wound other people with cruel actions, as well as speeches. Now, a way of plainly fighting this person would be simply to avoid him or her. However, the challenge is how to note an evil person before a person becomes interactive with him or her. Another trait of evil or an evil person would be deception (Freeman 1). It is a fact that evil individuals chronically tell lies to the extent that people never know when they are telling the truth. Pe ople are obliged to avoid much(prenominal) behaviors, and they should take it as their initiative never to believe a word of an evil person. It is viable even not to talk to evil people. That is a vital way of taking the initiative of fighting evil. Evil is also known to be a vital factor of manipulation. This is because evil people do not have a god complex. Evil individuals desire to be the center of the universe. They also think that they are the center of the universe. Hence, they will proceed with what they want so as to acquire what they need. Now, a person with high self esteem, as well as morals, cannot easily be manipulated. The only means to fight such an individual is to show them that they cannot easily control a persons life. That acts as a diminishing factor to evil people since they want to control everything (Freeman 1). This is a way of taking your own initiative to fight evil. Also, simply hoping that evil or an evil person will get better will not work. Hoping th ey will astonish people with goodness is also a poor strategy. If a person is in a position to control evil, then they should undertake the task. It will mostly work if the person takes on the evil person in public. This will put the evil person in a tough spot. It is not wise to send any message such as a text or email, not unless from a lawyer. Also, people can tackle evil if they have the ability to involve a higher(prenominal) person in the society (Freeman 1). If the evil person is breaking the organizations rules, the person should involve the boss in a way of fighting that evil. It is also advisable to make their actions known by everybody. Everybody trying